<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Sopoforic Agents in Childhood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 00:11:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Chemisty by H. G. Deming by Tracy Poff</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/general-chemisty-by-h-g-deming/#comment-175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Poff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Aug 2011 00:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a really interesting book, and quite different from the more modern chemistry books I&#039;ve seen. For example, the chapter on combustion contains lots of details about how to extinguish fires, describing the operation of various fire extinguishers and the composition of the chemicals they contain. It also has a &lt;em&gt;very&lt;/em&gt; nice section that describes how combustion occurs in a furnace, and what considerations there are for ensuring efficient burning. Extremely cool, and definitely unlike other textbooks I&#039;ve seen.

It&#039;s also interesting because it&#039;s so old, and techniques have changed so much. There are little things, like the suggestion that multiplication and division be performed with logarithms, since calculators were a ways off, and bigger things, like the rather different way molecules are described--rather than being described solely as consisting of X atoms of some element and Y atoms of another, in a certain configuration, as modern books do, this book describes them as consisting of certain &lt;em&gt;weights&lt;/em&gt; of elementary substances--a difference motivated, I guess, by the experimental techniques used at the time for identifying the composition of compounds.

I&#039;m quite glad I&#039;ve been reading it. I&#039;m a bit behind the schedule I set, I&#039;m afraid--I read a contemporary review of the book which indicated certain problems with the selection of material and the presentation of some topics, which induced me to slow down my reading while searching for another book, but even if there are such problems, I still think it&#039;s worth reading.

It is my intention to write a fuller review of the book when I&#039;ve finished it, so if you&#039;re interested in reading that, you&#039;ll need to wait another month or two. I hope this can satisfy your curiosity, for now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a really interesting book, and quite different from the more modern chemistry books I&#8217;ve seen. For example, the chapter on combustion contains lots of details about how to extinguish fires, describing the operation of various fire extinguishers and the composition of the chemicals they contain. It also has a <em>very</em> nice section that describes how combustion occurs in a furnace, and what considerations there are for ensuring efficient burning. Extremely cool, and definitely unlike other textbooks I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting because it&#8217;s so old, and techniques have changed so much. There are little things, like the suggestion that multiplication and division be performed with logarithms, since calculators were a ways off, and bigger things, like the rather different way molecules are described&#8211;rather than being described solely as consisting of X atoms of some element and Y atoms of another, in a certain configuration, as modern books do, this book describes them as consisting of certain <em>weights</em> of elementary substances&#8211;a difference motivated, I guess, by the experimental techniques used at the time for identifying the composition of compounds.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite glad I&#8217;ve been reading it. I&#8217;m a bit behind the schedule I set, I&#8217;m afraid&#8211;I read a contemporary review of the book which indicated certain problems with the selection of material and the presentation of some topics, which induced me to slow down my reading while searching for another book, but even if there are such problems, I still think it&#8217;s worth reading.</p>
<p>It is my intention to write a fuller review of the book when I&#8217;ve finished it, so if you&#8217;re interested in reading that, you&#8217;ll need to wait another month or two. I hope this can satisfy your curiosity, for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on General Chemisty by H. G. Deming by Galen Deming Emery</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/general-chemisty-by-h-g-deming/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Galen Deming Emery]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 01:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/?p=339#comment-174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, interestingly enough.. that book was written by my Great Grandfather.  I&#039;m curious to know what you think about it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, interestingly enough.. that book was written by my Great Grandfather.  I&#8217;m curious to know what you think about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Bridget Jones&#8217;s Diary by Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/bridget-joness-diary/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 04:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/02/17/bridget-joness-diary#comment-8</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I couldn&#039;t agree more. Comparing Eliza Bennet to the repugnant Brigit Jones is deeply offensive to the telent of Jane Austen and makes me really doubt the education of anyone who thinks so. Jones has no dignity, wit, intelligence and is completely without self esteem. &lt;/&gt;Yet I see it echoed all over the web that BJD is a modern P&amp;P. Only for the ignorant!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#39;t agree more. Comparing Eliza Bennet to the repugnant Brigit Jones is deeply offensive to the telent of Jane Austen and makes me really doubt the education of anyone who thinks so. Jones has no dignity, wit, intelligence and is completely without self esteem. Yet I see it echoed all over the web that BJD is a modern P&amp;P. Only for the ignorant!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Academics vs. Wikipedia, again by Tracy Poff</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/academics-vs-wikipedia-again/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Poff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/academics-vs-wikipedia-again#comment-7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@wikipedia review&lt;/&gt;I don&#039;t deny that Wikipedia has problems, or that students need to better understand what sort of information can and cannot be trusted. And, as scholars, to trust Wikipedia without verifying its sources would be folly. I do tend to think that Wikipedia is useful, though, and worth improving, and the idea that teachers should waste their time specifically teaching students about the &#039;threat&#039; of Wikipedia seems more than a bit ludicrous.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Whatever the particular merits of Wikipedia, though, I can&#039;t see Lichtenstein&#039;s argument as being accurate, in any real sense. The only statement she makes that I really agree with is:&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;&quot;There is a need for easy-to-use information that is correct and has been produced by a rigorous process.&quot;&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;However, I believe that a well-referenced Wikipedia article (like a &lt; HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GA&quot; REL=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Good Article&lt;&gt;, say), when viewed by a discerning reader (as all students ought to be, when doing research) is just such a source of information. Not &lt;&gt;all&lt;&gt; articles are of sufficient quality to pass this test, but improving them so that they are seems like a good goal, to me.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;While Lichtenstein says few things that are obviously wrong (her negative opinion of Wikipedia, however I may disagree with it, isn&#039;t really a falsifiable statement), she says few things that are clearly right, as well. Try not to confuse &quot;I agree with her opinions&quot; with &quot;her analysis was accurate.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wikipedia reviewI don&#8217;t deny that Wikipedia has problems, or that students need to better understand what sort of information can and cannot be trusted. And, as scholars, to trust Wikipedia without verifying its sources would be folly. I do tend to think that Wikipedia is useful, though, and worth improving, and the idea that teachers should waste their time specifically teaching students about the &#8216;threat&#8217; of Wikipedia seems more than a bit ludicrous.Whatever the particular merits of Wikipedia, though, I can&#8217;t see Lichtenstein&#8217;s argument as being accurate, in any real sense. The only statement she makes that I really agree with is:&#8220;There is a need for easy-to-use information that is correct and has been produced by a rigorous process.&#8221;However, I believe that a well-referenced Wikipedia article (like a < HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:GA" REL="nofollow">Good Article<>, say), when viewed by a discerning reader (as all students ought to be, when doing research) is just such a source of information. Not <>all<> articles are of sufficient quality to pass this test, but improving them so that they are seems like a good goal, to me.While Lichtenstein says few things that are obviously wrong (her negative opinion of Wikipedia, however I may disagree with it, isn&#8217;t really a falsifiable statement), she says few things that are clearly right, as well. Try not to confuse &#8220;I agree with her opinions&#8221; with &#8220;her analysis was accurate.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Academics vs. Wikipedia, again by Wikipedia Review</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/academics-vs-wikipedia-again/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wikipedia Review]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 12:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/04/14/academics-vs-wikipedia-again#comment-6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leichenstein&#039;s analysis was fairly accurate.  &lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Wikipedia fails to meet the basic standards required to become a service to students. And there is a growing mountain of evidence of its failings. Many of which are very serious.   &lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;The best course of action for any teacher is to educate pupils as to the ongoing danger and threat posed Wikipedia to all publishing standards. And impress upon others the need for reform.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leichenstein&#8217;s analysis was fairly accurate.  Wikipedia fails to meet the basic standards required to become a service to students. And there is a growing mountain of evidence of its failings. Many of which are very serious.   The best course of action for any teacher is to educate pupils as to the ongoing danger and threat posed Wikipedia to all publishing standards. And impress upon others the need for reform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on On citations and plagiarism by Scarian</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/on-citations-and-plagiarism/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/on-citations-and-plagiarism#comment-5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to blog a post of my own on education and Wikipedia, actually.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;But I&#039;d find it hard maintaing a balance between positives, negatives and humour.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Good post! I liked it a lot. :-) ~~~~]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to blog a post of my own on education and Wikipedia, actually.But I&#8217;d find it hard maintaing a balance between positives, negatives and humour.Good post! I liked it a lot. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  ~~~~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The end of print by Scarian</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/the-end-of-print/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scarian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 18:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2008/03/16/the-end-of-print#comment-4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Positive inside a negative :-)&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;If you look at it from an evolution point of view, it&#039;s just like the floppy disk... it&#039;s been moved to the side to allow the more efficient flash drive.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Fortunately, the world will always keep moving on and changing and adapting... one day internet encyclopaedia&#039;s will be replaced (by...?) and in 30 years time you&#039;ll be writing &quot;The end of the Wiki&quot;...&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Let&#039;s hope that it won&#039;t be for a while :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positive inside a negative <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> If you look at it from an evolution point of view, it&#8217;s just like the floppy disk&#8230; it&#8217;s been moved to the side to allow the more efficient flash drive.Fortunately, the world will always keep moving on and changing and adapting&#8230; one day internet encyclopaedia&#8217;s will be replaced (by&#8230;?) and in 30 years time you&#8217;ll be writing &#8220;The end of the Wiki&#8221;&#8230;Let&#8217;s hope that it won&#8217;t be for a while <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Final Fantasy VII: Voices of the Lifestream by Larry &#34;Liontamer&#34; Oji</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/final-fantasy-vii-voices-of-the-lifestream/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Larry &#34;Liontamer&#34; Oji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2007/10/19/final-fantasy-vii-voices-of-the-lifestream#comment-3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should write that review sometime. :-D&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Hope you enjoyed the album, Tracy. Thanks a lot for checking it out!&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Larry &quot;Liontamer&quot; Oji&lt;/&gt;Head Submissions Evaluator, OverClocked ReMix&lt;/&gt;Creator, VG Frequency&lt;/&gt;http://www.ocremix.org&lt;/&gt;http://www.vgfrequency.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should write that review sometime. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> Hope you enjoyed the album, Tracy. Thanks a lot for checking it out!Larry &#8220;Liontamer&#8221; OjiHead Submissions Evaluator, OverClocked ReMixCreator, VG Frequency<a href="http://www.ocremix.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.ocremix.org</a><a href="http://www.vgfrequency.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.vgfrequency.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on At Wit&#8217;s End by Mike</title>
		<link>http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/at-wits-end/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Sep 2007 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sopoforic.wordpress.com/2007/09/11/at-wits-end#comment-2</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for taking time to play &amp; write about your experience with At Wit&#039;s End.  Seems like a life time ago that I entered it into the comp -- funny to see somebody talk about it 7 years later.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;I had fun creating AWE; hope you had some enjoyment playing it.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;I agree with the food puzzle (even in 2000 it was past its time) and the barn puzzle was way too much.  Lessons learned in future games I authored... :)&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;Thanks again for your review.&lt;/&gt;&lt;/&gt;-- Mike]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking time to play &#038; write about your experience with At Wit&#8217;s End.  Seems like a life time ago that I entered it into the comp &#8212; funny to see somebody talk about it 7 years later.I had fun creating AWE; hope you had some enjoyment playing it.I agree with the food puzzle (even in 2000 it was past its time) and the barn puzzle was way too much.  Lessons learned in future games I authored&#8230; <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Thanks again for your review.&#8211; Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
